MEASURING AI’S IMPACT ON EMPLOYMENT: A FRAMEWORK FOR ENHANCING BLS METHODOLOGIES TO SUPPORT WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT AND EDUCATION POLICY
Main Article Content
Abstract
: The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into the U.S. labor market presents significant challenges for accurately forecasting employment trends, skill requirements, and workforce development needs. This paper examines how the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) can enhance its employment projection methodologies to better capture AI’s impact on occupations, worker skills, and educational requirements. Drawing on 26 recent empirical studies and BLS’s existing frameworks, we summarize a comprehensive approach that combines task-based exposure modeling, real-time data analytics, causal inference methods, and improved gross flows estimation for tracking worker transitions. Key focus include a discussion on Dynamic Occupational AI Exposure Score (OAIES) that distinguishes between automation risk and augmentation potential at the task level, enhanced data collection strategies using job postings and administrative records, Bayesian inference methods for survey estimation, and refined methods for estimating how workers move between occupations as AI transforms job requirements. The paper integrates findings from multiple BLS methodological studies on productivity measurement, price indices, and employment projections. These enhancements would provide educators, policymakers, and workforce development professionals with more accurate, timely information to design training programs, allocate resources, and prepare students for an AI-driven economy. The paper concludes with a phased implementation strategy and recommendations for collaboration between BLS, educational institutions, and workforce agencies. This is a review paper and all ideas are from cited references
Article Details
Section
COPYRIGHT
Submission of a manuscript implies: that the work described has not been published before, that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that if and when the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
- The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.
References
[1] K. Pandey, “Artificial intelligence and the evolving labor market: A comprehensive review and policy roadmap,” Journal of Contemporary Technological Studies, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 1–10, 2025, doi: 10.32996/jcts.2025.7.10.33.
[2] J. Colato, L. Ice, and S. Laycock, “Industry and occupational employment projections overview and highlights, 2023–33,” Monthly Labor Review, Nov. 2024, Available : https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2024/article/industry-and-occupational-employment-projections-overview-and-highlights-2023-33.htm, doi: 10.21916/mlr.2024.21
[3] N. Smith, M. Van Der Werf, M. Adelson, and J. Strohl, “Falling behind: How skills shortages threaten future jobs,” Georgetown University Center on Education; the Workforce, 2025. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED676644
[4] G. J. Blackwood, “Job tasks, worker skills, and productivity,” Working Paper, 2023. https://www2.census.gov/library/working-papers/2025/adrm/ces/CES-WP-25-63.pdf
[5] Mulwa, Damaris Felistus and Segawa, Arnold, The Impact of AI on Occupational Tasks in the U.S. Economy (September 15, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6014354 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6014354
[6] C. Machovec, M. J. Rieley, and E. Rolen, “Incorporating AI impacts in BLS employment projections: Occupational case studies,” Monthly Labor Review, Feb. 2025, available : https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2025/article/incorporating-ai-impacts-in-bls-employment-projections.htm, doi: 10.21916/mlr.2025.1.
[7] “Assessing the impact of new technologies on the labor market: Key constructs, gaps, and data collection strategies for the bureau of labor statistics.” Accessed: Mar. 04, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.bls.gov/bls/congressional-reports/assessing-the-impact-of-new-technologies-on-the-labor-market.htm
[8] N. Modica, “Industry growth patterns: A closer look at output, productivity, and hours worked from 1990 to 2024,” Monthly Labor Review, 2025, available : https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2025/article/industry-growth-patterns-a-closer-look-at-output-productivity-and-hours-worked-from-1990-to-2024.htm, doi: 10.21916/mlr.2025.21.
[9] “Growth trends for selected occupations considered at risk from automation.” Accessed: Mar. 04, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2022/article/growth-trends-for-selected-occupations-considered-at-risk-from-automation.htm
[10] L. P. Eldridge, “Productivity measurement: Does output choice matter?” url: https://www.bls.gov/osmr/research-papers/2023/ec230030.htm, Working Paper, 2024.
[11] “GDP, GDI, and GDO: An evaluation of output measures for productivity analysis.” Accessed: Mar. 04, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2026/article/gdp-gdi-and-gdo-an-evaluation-of-output-measures-for-productivity-analysis.htm
[12] B. Adams, “Hedonic price indexes under static pricing: An application to PPI microprocessors,” url https://www.bls.gov/osmr/research-papers/2024/ec240120.htm, Working Paper, 2024.
[13] M. Cho, “Time series analysis of consumer price index products and weights,” Working Paper, 2024.
[14] Y. Izsak and M. Moleres, “A simulation study of multiple imputation methods for the producer price index,” Working Paper, 2024.
[15] T. D. Savitsky, L. G. León-Novelo, and H. Engle, “Bayesian inference for repeated measures under informative sampling,” Journal of Official Statistics, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 161–189, 2024, doi: 10.1177/0282423X241235252.
[16] E. W. Handwerker and M. Dey, “Some facts about concentrated labor markets in the united states,” Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 132–151, 2024, doi: 10.1111/irel.12341.
[17] E. W. Handwerker, “Outsourcing, occupationally homogeneous employers, and wage inequality in the united states,” Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 41, no. S1, pp. S173–S203, 2023, doi: 10.1086/726634.
[18] S. M. Miller and C. Doherty, “Evaluation of a modified gross flows estimator for the current population survey,” Working Paper, 2023. https://www.bls.gov/osmr/research-papers/2024/st240100.htm
[19] Murtazashvili, Ilia and Lazanski, Dominique and Schwanke, Beth, Building the AI Workforce: The Need for Accurate Data to Inform US Policy (August 21, 2025). Center for Governance and Markets Paper No. FAI1-2025, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5682184 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5682184
[20] S. Essandoh, J. K. Sakyi, A. K. Ibrahim, C. M. Okafor, and L. Wedraogo, “Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Impacts on employment and job roles,” International Journal of Multidisciplinary Futuristic Development, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 31–41, 2025, doi: 10.54660/IJMFD.2025.6.1.31-41.
[21] L. Naisho, “Securing america’s technological leadership: Harnessing AI and automation for economic growth, global competitiveness, and inclusive prosperity,” Open Journal of Political Science, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 289–310, 2025, doi: 10.4236/ojps.2025.152017.
[22] S. Joshi, “Generative AI: Mitigating workforce and economic disruptions while strategizing policy responses for governments and companies.” DOI:10.2139/ssrn.5135229
[23] J. Satyadhar, “Introduction to generative AI: Its impact on jobs, education, work and policy making.” [Online]. Available: 10.20944/preprints202503.2126.v1
[24] “Breaking it down: A decomposition of the 2024 gain in private-sector average hourly earnings by major industry sector.” Accessed: Mar. 04, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2025/article/a-decomposition-of-ahe.htm
[25] “Productivity and progress.” Accessed: Mar. 04, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2017/book-review/productivity-and-progress.htm
[26] “Monthly labor review home page.” Accessed: Mar. 04, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/
[27] Michael J. Rieley, and Javier Colato, "Industry and occupational employment projections overview and highlights, 2024–34," Monthly Labor Review, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, January 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.21916/mlr.2026.1, url: https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2026/article/industry-and-occupational-employment-projections-overview.htm
[28] Noell Koehlinger, "How veterans’ benefits relate to their spending in the Consumer Expenditure Surveys," Monthly Labor Review, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, February 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.21916/mlr.2026.4 , url: https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2026/article/how-veterans-benefits-relate-to-their-spending-in-the-consumer-expenditure-surveys.htm